Terms and ConditionsDo Not Sell or Share My Personal InformationPrivacy PolicyPrivacy NoticeAccessibility NoticeUnsubscribe
Copyright © 2026 Day In History
March 13: A Planet Discovered, Evolution Banned, A Life Taken

Today, March 13th

March 13: A Planet Discovered, Evolution Banned, A Life Taken

March 13 has witnessed humanity at its most curious, its most fearful, and its most tragic. An astronomer with a homemade telescope doubled the known size of our solar system, proving that patient observation could reveal cosmic truths. A state legislature banned teaching scientific theory because it threatened religious doctrine, choosing ideology over inquiry. And police executing a flawed warrant killed an innocent woman in her own home, exposing systemic failures in law enforcement that sparked a reckoning with racial justice. These three moments reveal the spectrum of human nature—our capacity for discovery, our tendency toward suppression when threatened, and our ability to inflict devastating harm through careless power.
March 13: A Planet Discovered, Evolution Banned, A Life Taken

12 March

March 12: Scouts Founded, Salt March Begins, Women Ordained

March 12: Scouts Founded, Salt March Begins, Women Ordained Three moments when doors opened—for girls to lead, for colonized people to resist, for women to serve March 12 has witnessed three distinct expressions of expanding possibility. An organization was born that would teach generations of American girls that they were capable of more than society expected. A revolutionary leader began a 240-mile walk to the sea that would help topple an empire through the simple act of making salt. And a church that had excluded women from its priesthood for centuries finally opened its doors, allowing women to lead worship and administer sacraments. Together, these moments remind us that change often begins with someone deciding that the old rules no longer apply, that barriers exist to be challenged, and that institutions can evolve when enough people demand it. Be Prepared On March 12, 1912, Juliette Gordon Low gathered 18 girls in Savannah, Georgia, for the first meeting of what she initially called the Girl Guides, soon renamed Girl Scouts of the USA. Low, a widow who had been inspired by meeting Robert Baden-Powell, founder of the Boy Scouts, envisioned an organization where girls could develop physical fitness, outdoor skills, community service habits, and self-reliance. At a time when women couldn't vote and societal expectations confined girls to domestic preparation, Low was teaching them to camp, hike, swim, and engage with their communities as active citizens rather than passive homemakers. The Girl Scouts grew rapidly, offering girls experiences previously reserved for boys. They learned first aid, navigation, and survival skills. They sold cookies to fund their activities, creating one of America's most recognizable fundraising traditions. The organization integrated racially in the 1950s, decades before many institutions. It adapted its programs across generations, adding badges for computer skills, entrepreneurship, and STEM fields alongside traditional outdoor activities. Today, Girl Scouts has served over 50 million members since its founding. Low's genius was recognizing that girls needed the same opportunities for adventure, leadership, and skill-building that boys received—and that given those opportunities, they would prove just as capable. The organization she founded demonstrated that empowerment begins with taking girls seriously, giving them challenges, and trusting them to rise to meet them.   In Savannah, eighteen girls began a movement that would empower millions The March to the Sea Eighteen years later, on March 12, 1930, Mahatma Gandhi began his Salt March, walking from his Sabarmati Ashram toward the Arabian Sea, 240 miles away. British colonial law prohibited Indians from collecting or selling salt, forcing them to buy heavily taxed salt from the British monopoly. Gandhi chose this issue deliberately—salt was essential to every Indian, rich or poor, and the tax was both economically burdensome and symbolically insulting. By walking to the sea to make salt from evaporated seawater, Gandhi would commit a simple act of civil disobedience that would electrify India and capture world attention. Gandhi, then 61 years old, walked roughly 12 miles each day, stopping at villages to speak about independence and nonviolent resistance. His march grew—what began with 78 followers swelled to thousands. International journalists covered the journey, puzzled but fascinated by this frail man in homespun cloth challenging an empire by making salt. On April 6, Gandhi reached the coastal village of Dandi, picked up a lump of natural salt from the beach, and declared, "With this, I am shaking the foundations of the British Empire." Mass civil disobedience erupted across India as millions made illegal salt. British authorities arrested over 60,000 people, including Gandhi. The Salt March didn't immediately win independence—that would take 17 more years—but it demonstrated that British rule rested on Indian cooperation, and that cooperation could be withdrawn. Gandhi proved that nonviolent resistance could challenge power effectively, that symbolic acts could carry enormous weight, and that sometimes the most revolutionary thing is simply refusing to obey unjust laws. Gandhi's 240-mile walk to make salt would shake the foundations of empire ❦ Breaking the Stained Glass Ceiling On March 12, 1994, sixty-four years after Gandhi began his Salt March, the Church of England ordained its first 32 female priests in a ceremony at Bristol Cathedral. The moment arrived after decades of debate, theological argument, and legislative maneuvering. The Church of England had been ordaining women as deacons since 1987, allowing them to perform most priestly duties except celebrating communion and pronouncing absolution. The 1992 General Synod vote to allow women's ordination passed by just two votes in the House of Laity—the narrowest possible margin. The decision prompted some traditionalist Anglicans to leave for Roman Catholicism, while others remained but refused to accept female priests' ministry. The women ordained that day had waited years, sometimes decades, for permission to exercise the ministry they felt called to perform. Some had served as deacons for years, doing virtually all priestly work except the sacramental acts reserved for priests. Their ordination represented more than personal achievement; it challenged centuries of theological arguments that women were unsuitable for priesthood, that they couldn't represent Christ at the altar, that their ordination violated apostolic tradition. The Church of England's decision influenced other Anglican provinces worldwide, though the issue remains divisive. In 2015, the church consecrated its first female bishop. The women ordained in 1994 proved that gender had nothing to do with ability to serve, that theological arguments against women's ordination rested on cultural bias rather than divine mandate, and that institutions claiming timeless traditions could, in fact, change when forced to reckon with justice. They broke the stained glass ceiling, demonstrating that women could perform the same sacramental functions as men—and that God, apparently, didn't object.   In Bristol Cathedral, women broke centuries of tradition and became priests

12 March

March 12: When Nations Take Their Ball and Go Home

March 12: When Nations Take Their Ball and Go Home Iran announced it will not participate in the 2026 FIFA World Cup — co-hosted by the United States — citing the ongoing war and the safety of its players. It would be the first politically motivated withdrawal by a qualified team in the tournament's 96-year history. Iran's Minister of Sport and Youth, Ahmad Donyamali, declared on March 11 that his country's national soccer team would not compete in this summer's FIFA World Cup. "Given that this corrupt government has assassinated our leader and created extreme insecurity, we cannot participate in the World Cup," Donyamali said in remarks broadcast on Iranian state television. "The players have no safety, and the conditions for participation simply don't exist." Iran had been scheduled to play all three of its group stage matches on American soil — in Los Angeles and Seattle — making the announcement a collision of sport, war, and geopolitics unlike anything the World Cup has witnessed in the modern era. Sport's Oldest Protest, on Football's Biggest Stage The 2026 World Cup — set to run from June 11 through July 19 across the United States, Canada, and Mexico — was already the most politically charged tournament in the competition's 96-year history before Iran's announcement. FIFA has not formally commented on the withdrawal, but the tournament's regulations give the governing body broad discretion over how to respond, including the option to replace Iran in Group G with another nation such as Iraq or the United Arab Emirates. Under FIFA rules, a team that withdraws could face a fine of hundreds of thousands of dollars and a potential ban from future competition. A withdrawal so close to the tournament's opening is without precedent in the modern era of the sport. But the history of nations using sport as a stage for political protest is long, complicated, and instructive. The most famous parallel is not from football but from the Olympics: in 1980, more than 60 countries led by the United States boycotted the Moscow Summer Games following the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan — and four years later, the USSR and 18 allies returned the favor in Los Angeles, citing "security concerns." In World Cup history, politically motivated withdrawals have typically occurred during qualifying rather than at the tournament itself. In 1974, the Soviet Union refused to travel to Chile for a playoff match, describing the stadium as an "arena of torture and execution" after the coup that killed President Salvador Allende — and was disqualified as a result. In 1966, all African nations boycotted the tournament in England over FIFA's allocation of only one shared qualifying spot among Africa, Asia, and Oceania; the protest ultimately forced FIFA to guarantee African nations their own automatic qualifying berths, reshaping the global game for decades.   When Iran walks away from the 2026 World Cup, it will leave behind empty seats in Los Angeles and Seattle — and a place in history as the first qualified team to make a politically motivated withdrawal from the tournament itself. What makes this moment historically singular is its geometry: the nation at war with the host country had already qualified, had already been drawn into groups, had already been assigned stadiums in American cities. Iranian-Americans in Seattle — some of whom view the U.S. military campaign as liberation, others who had hoped to cheer their national team in the country they now call home — find themselves caught in the full human complexity of the story. FIFA President Gianni Infantino, following a meeting with President Trump, noted that the Iranian team remained "welcome to compete." The team, for now, has said it will not. History will record not just that Iran stayed home from the World Cup of 2026, but that the World Cup itself — sport's greatest festival of shared humanity — could not escape the gravity of a war being fought in real time.

Get Daily Historical Facts!